The
New York Court of Appeals is the highest court in the state. Laws can be created by our courts or it can further develop the statutory laws established by the legislature. In this section, you will find some of the explanatory case law developments to the New York Domestic Relations Law on marriage and prenuptial agreements that will assist your understanding of the statutes.
MARRIAGE LICENSE/CERTIFICATES
Marriage
as Civil Contract (DRL 10)
- Fearon v. Treanor, 272 N.Y. 268 (1936)
– marriage is more than a mere contract, a relationship is created at the formation
of a marriage which the law holds the parties to various obligations and
liabilities.
- So essentially, once the
relationship has been formed, the obligations, duties, and rights of the
parties may be regulated or restricted by law.
- Hartog
v. Hartog, 85 N.Y.2d 537 (1995) – this case stands for the notion that marriage
is now viewed as an economic partnership in New York. Each party
contributes to the partnership as a spouse, wage earner, homemaker or
parent. As a result, courts now have the power at the dissolution of a
marriage to divide “fruits of the partnership” which reflects each of the parties’
needs and individual circumstances, absent a contrary agreement. O’Brien
v. O’Brien, 66 N.Y.2d 576
- Kleila
v. Kleila, 50 N.Y.2d 277 (1980) - When parties have entered into an agreement to
change the statutory obligations, such as a post or pre-nuptial agreement,
the courts are not granted broad powers to change the terms because it may
be contrary to the parties constitutional rights.
Same Sex Marriage (DRL
5 & 10)
- Hernandez
v. Robles, 7 N.Y.3d 338 (2006) – in this case same sex couples challenged a licensing
bureau which denied same sex couples a marriage license, claiming that the
Domestic Relations Law did not permit same sex marriages. The constitutionality
of the Domestic Relations Law was challenged as being unconstitutional
because it limited same sex marriages. The New York Court of Appeals held
that the DRL prohibiting same sex marriage neither violated the
constitutional provisions of Equal Protection nor Due Process.
PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS
-
In this country there has been a strong public
policy for allowing people to decide their own interest through contractual
agreements. (Bloomfield v. Bloomfield, 97 N.Y.2d 188 (2001)).
-
A couple can contract in the form of a
premarital agreement and decide the settlement in case of the dissolution of
the marriage which may be enforced in equity by specific performance. (Phalen
v. United States Trusts Co. 186 N.Y. 178 (1906)).
- But one must note, that in an action for
equity, the judge has a wide range of discretion. (Phalen v. United States
Trusts Co. 186 N.Y. 178 (1906))
- Prenuptial agreements are interpreted
according to the construction of deeds and contracts. One of the main
principles governing the construction of deeds and contracts is to give effect
to the parties intentions. (Bloomfield v. Bloomfield, 97 N.Y.2d 188 (2001))
- A court is not at liberty to change the
terms of the agreement under the guise of construing party intentions, even if
the court finds that the parties were unwise in making their decisions. (Taber
v. First Citizens Bank Trust Co., 273 N.Y. 539 (1937)).
- There must be FULL financial disclosure
for a prenuptial agreement to be held valid. Parties must identify real and
personal property or the agreement will be rendered unenforceable. (Darius v.
Darius, 245 A.D.2d 663 (2d Dep’t 1997)).
|
|
RESEARCH TIPS
Hard Copy - Gould Library, Touro Law
Center: located on the second floor of the library. Search for cases by
citation - Volume number is on the left, followed by the New York Official
Reporter edition, and the page number of the bound book.
- New York Reporter (Only for NY Court of Appeals cases)
- North Eastern Reporter (Only for NY Court of Appeals
cases)
- Appellate Division Reporter (Only for Appellate
Division cases)
- Miscellaneous Reports (Supreme Court and other trial
court cases)
- New York Supplement (All level cases)
Online
Forms
To find sample prenuptial agreement forms: New York Forms Legal and Business
sections 27:8 – 27:20
|